When a member reasonably doubts the announced result of a vote, he may:

When a member has reasonable doubt about the announced results of a vote, calling for "Division" is the appropriate action because it prompts a more precise method of voting, often by having members stand to indicate their vote. This method ensures that any uncertainties regarding the vote count can be resolved immediately and visibly, providing clarity and transparency.

The term "Division" is used to signify that the results of the vote are contested, and a standing vote is more concrete, allowing members to physically demonstrate their choice rather than relying on a voice vote or the discretion of the chair. This process helps in accurately determining the majority opinion, reinforcing the integrity of the parliamentary procedure.

While other choices may also suggest ways to address voting doubts, they do not provide the direct and immediate avenue that calling for "Division" does. For example, a recount might not be feasible if the vote has not been structured for such a procedure, and requesting to see a tally does not actively engage the assembly in re-evaluating the results on the spot. Asking for a meeting to discuss the results diverts attention away from resolving the vote at hand. Thus, calling for "Division" directly addresses the uncertainty and is the correct course of action.